Re: Reordering of functions

Didn't see the original reply, but...:
>> In fact, most compiler/frameworks sup****t function-inlining which
>> may lead to even bigger functions, which again may lead to a cache
>> being to small to hold more than just one function, in such cases
>> such a reordering does not make much sense.

But remember that most current processors have more than one level of
cache. I doubt there are many, if any, functions in existence that would
exceed the capacity of, say, the Montecito L3 cache (16 MB or so).

	Jan