Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Compilers > Re: Reordering ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 4 of 11 Topic 2331 of 2474
Post > Topic >>

Re: Reordering of functions

by =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Jan_Vorbr=FCggen?= <Jan.Vorbrueggen@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 25, 2008 at 11:39 AM

Didn't see the original reply, but...:
>> In fact, most compiler/frameworks sup****t function-inlining which
>> may lead to even bigger functions, which again may lead to a cache
>> being to small to hold more than just one function, in such cases
>> such a reordering does not make much sense.

But remember that most current processors have more than one level of
cache. I doubt there are many, if any, functions in existence that would
exceed the capacity of, say, the Montecito L3 cache (16 MB or so).

	Jan
 




 11 Posts in Topic:
Reordering of functions
Tim Frink <plfriko@[EM  2008-02-18 17:22:52 
Re: Reordering of functions
"Nikolai Kim" &  2008-02-18 22:33:31 
Re: Reordering of functions
Tim Frink <plfriko@[EM  2008-02-21 09:53:21 
Re: Reordering of functions
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Jan_Vorbr  2008-02-25 11:39:05 
Re: Reordering of functions
Joel Yliluoma <bisqwit  2008-02-19 11:33:56 
Re: Reordering of functions
Tim Frink <plfriko@[EM  2008-02-21 09:41:38 
Re: Reordering of functions
glen herrmannsfeldt <g  2008-02-24 01:59:56 
Re: Reordering of functions
Chris F Clark <cfc@[EM  2008-02-19 09:55:43 
Re: Reordering of functions
Tim Frink <plfriko@[EM  2008-02-21 09:36:08 
Re: Reordering of functions
Chris F Clark <cfc@[EM  2008-02-24 17:57:01 
Re: Reordering of functions
George Neuner <gneuner  2008-02-25 17:15:36 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Jul 25 20:06:03 CDT 2008.