Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Compilers LCC > Re: Progress in...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 23 of 27 Topic 950 of 1070
Post > Topic >>

Re: Progress in data processing

by CBFalconer <cbfalconer@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 1, 2007 at 05:53 PM

jacob navia wrote:
> CBFalconer wrote:
>
.... snip ...
>>
>> But you can't (sometimes) run new software on old hardware.
>> lcc-win32 is an example, which creates some form of trap the
>> moment you try the debugger.  The docs specify it runs under
>> W98, but it doesn't.
> 
> IR WILL NOT RUN IN A 486 CHUCK!!!!!
> 
> I have told you this a thousand times.
> 
> It needs pentium1 or higher

I know that.  However W98 runs on a 486, and you claim it runs
under W98.  Which means your do***entation is non-trustworthy. 
I've said this before.

-- 
 <http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt>
 <http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/423>
 <http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit043.html>
 <http://kadaitcha.cx/vista/dogsbreakfast/index.html>
                        cbfalconer at maineline dot net



-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 




 27 Posts in Topic:
Progress in data processing
jacob navia <jacob@[EM  2007-05-31 21:28:29 
Re: Progress in data processing
Karl Heinze <nomail@[E  2007-05-31 22:47:36 
Re: Progress in data processing
Vic Dura <vpdura@[EMAI  2007-05-31 17:09:11 
Re: Progress in data processing
Karl Heinze <nomail@[E  2007-06-01 00:25:16 
Re: Progress in data processing
Vic Dura <vpdura@[EMAI  2007-05-31 20:37:51 
Re: Progress in data processing
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2007-05-31 17:15:05 
Re: Progress in data processing
Ian Collins <ian-news@  2007-06-01 10:28:17 
Re: Progress in data processing
Jeremy Thomson <panzer  2007-05-31 16:31:08 
Re: Progress in data processing
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2007-06-01 03:28:28 
Re: Progress in data processing
"Barry" <bar  2007-06-01 18:20:44 
Re: Progress in data processing
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2007-06-01 23:55:27 
Re: Progress in data processing
Cesar Rabak <csrabak@[  2007-06-01 00:19:43 
Re: Progress in data processing
ArarghMail705NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-05-31 23:37:38 
Re: Progress in data processing
Old Wolf <oldwolf@[EMA  2007-05-31 19:37:36 
Re: Progress in data processing
Ian Collins <ian-news@  2007-06-01 14:50:56 
Re: Progress in data processing
Clark Cox <clarkcox3@[  2007-05-31 20:42:26 
Re: Progress in data processing
Richard Heathfield <rj  2007-06-01 09:51:16 
Re: Progress in data processing
"Army1987" <  2007-06-02 14:45:04 
Re: Progress in data processing
neitzel@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-06-01 10:44:25 
Re: Progress in data processing
Vic Dura <vpdura@[EMAI  2007-06-01 08:21:53 
Re: Progress in data processing
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2007-06-01 11:27:16 
Re: Progress in data processing
jacob navia <jacob@[EM  2007-06-01 22:08:23 
Re: Progress in data processing
CBFalconer <cbfalconer  2007-06-01 17:53:39 
Re: Progress in data processing
Harald van =?UTF-8?B?RMSz  2007-06-02 01:37:28 
Re: Progress in data processing
Johan Bengtsson <qwert  2007-06-01 19:30:29 
Re: Progress in data processing
"stdazi@[EMAIL PROTE  2007-06-02 12:25:47 
Re: Progress in data processing
Richard Heathfield <rj  2007-06-02 12:59:11 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Oct 10 23:40:33 CDT 2008.