Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Basic General > Re: BBC and DEF...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 39 of 81 Topic 620 of 702
Post > Topic >>

Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]

by "news@[EMAIL PROTECTED] " <news@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sep 9, 2007 at 02:57 AM

On Sep 9, 7:44 am, Derek <derek...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> The Microsoft BASIC interpreter for the Intel 8080 certainly had the
> DEFxxx statements by version 4, if not earlier. They were certainly
> available on my NASCOM 2 in 1980 at any rate. So it does seem a bit
> strange that the BBC left them out of its dialect.

Looking back at my records the BBC Specification stated 'The general
syntax of all commands should be identical to Microsoft Basic 5.0',
but in the list of commands and statements that followed DEFINT etc.
were *not* included.  There was a caveat which said 'If there is any
conflict between what is said below and the Microsoft specification
then the latter should be used' but I suspect that was conveniently
ignored.

Everything was on a very tight time schedule and inevitably BBC BASIC
had to be based on Acorn's older Atom Basic and on the Proton Basic
they had started to develop.  Whilst the BBC was able to insist on a
large number of changes and extra features to meet its requirements,
including improved compatibility with Microsoft BASIC, there had to be
some compromise and its original high aim of almost complete
compatibility was never met.

The rest is history.  The BBC Micro was far more successful than even
the most optimistic predictions and BBC BASIC became, in the UK at
least, far better known and more widely used than any Microsoft
Basic.  By that stage, and since, nobody has really cared much about
compatibility.

Richard.
http://www.rtrussell.co.uk/
To reply by email change 'news' to my forename.
 




 81 Posts in Topic:
Using GOTO
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-09-06 14:29:31 
Re: Using GOTO
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-09-06 11:51:52 
Re: Using GOTO
spambait@[EMAIL PROTECTED  2007-09-06 17:12:09 
Re: Using GOTO
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-09-07 04:26:16 
Re: Using GOTO
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-09-11 11:45:38 
Re: Using GOTO
"JJ" <stacko  2007-09-11 19:59:44 
Re: Using GOTO
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-09-13 07:30:56 
Re: Using GOTO
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-09-06 09:08:11 
Re: Using GOTO
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-09-06 15:18:36 
Re: Using GOTO
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-09-06 15:53:00 
Re: Using GOTO
"Gordon Rahman"  2007-09-06 23:04:46 
Re: Using GOTO
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-09-06 14:29:10 
Re: Using GOTO
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-09-06 21:32:15 
Re: Using GOTO
Eric <englere_geo@[EMA  2007-09-06 14:33:28 
Re: Using GOTO
Bert Byfield <BertByfi  2007-09-07 01:49:49 
Re: Using GOTO
"Gordon Rahman"  2007-09-07 01:26:05 
Re: Using GOTO
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-09-06 17:02:47 
Re: Using GOTO
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-09-06 21:37:58 
Re: Using GOTO
Bert Byfield <BertByfi  2007-09-07 01:52:00 
Re: Using GOTO
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-09-07 06:21:26 
Re: Using GOTO
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-09-06 17:22:42 
Re: Using GOTO
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-09-07 01:47:13 
Re: Using GOTO
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-09-07 01:50:34 
Re: Using GOTO
"Gordon Rahman"  2007-09-07 12:52:11 
Re: Using GOTO
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-09-07 07:27:26 
BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-09-08 13:58:42 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-09-08 09:20:47 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-09-08 12:35:58 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-09-15 11:29:36 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
budgie <me@[EMAIL PROT  2007-09-16 13:41:32 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-09-16 09:56:21 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-09-08 12:35:58 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-09-08 09:20:47 
BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-09-08 13:58:42 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-09-08 09:14:03 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Tom Lake" <  2007-09-10 07:59:48 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Tom Lake" <  2007-09-10 07:59:48 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
Derek <derekrss@[EMAIL  2007-09-08 23:44:55 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-09-09 02:57:07 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-09-09 07:14:46 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-09-09 07:14:46 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-09-09 08:43:28 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-09-09 11:28:45 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Tom Lake" <  2007-09-09 14:24:47 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-09-09 14:21:39 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Tom Lake" <  2007-09-09 16:44:45 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-09-09 17:31:18 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-09-10 09:46:37 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-09-10 09:46:37 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Tom Lake" <  2007-09-09 16:44:45 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-09-09 14:21:39 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Tom Lake" <  2007-09-09 14:24:47 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-09-09 11:28:45 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-09-09 15:28:28 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Tom Lake" <  2007-09-09 20:10:59 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-09-10 10:44:36 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-09-10 10:44:36 
FOR NEXT behavior
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-09-10 01:40:46 
Re: FOR NEXT behavior
"JJ" <stacko  2007-09-10 14:04:09 
Re: FOR NEXT behavior
Fred McKenzie <fmmck@[  2007-09-10 14:51:40 
Re: FOR NEXT behavior
"JJ" <stacko  2007-09-10 14:04:09 
Re: FOR NEXT behavior
Fred McKenzie <fmmck@[  2007-09-10 14:51:40 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-09-10 05:14:37 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Tom Lake" <  2007-09-10 14:17:55 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"JJ" <stacko  2007-09-10 20:08:48 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Tom Lake" <  2007-09-10 15:44:28 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Tom Lake" <  2007-09-10 15:53:08 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Tom Lake" <  2007-09-10 15:53:08 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Tom Lake" <  2007-09-10 15:44:28 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"Tom Lake" <  2007-09-10 14:17:55 
Re: FOR NEXT behavior
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-09-10 06:32:31 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-09-10 09:48:04 
Re: Using GOTO
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-09-12 00:36:03 
FOR NEXT behavior
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-09-13 19:08:27 
Re: FOR NEXT behavior
"Tom Lake" <  2007-09-14 00:06:07 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-09-08 09:14:03 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-09-09 02:57:07 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-09-09 08:43:28 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-09-09 15:28:28 
Re: FOR NEXT behavior
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-09-10 06:32:31 
Re: BBC and DEFINT etc [Was: Using GOTO]
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-09-10 09:48:04 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Nov 20 19:38:04 CST 2008.