Re: Using GOTO

In article <op60e3hg2nat0l2aujvmqeuutpphgi01ck@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Happy Trails
<nomail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:29:31 GMT, ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Phred)
>wrote:
>>I've been following the debate on GOTO elsewhere here in c.l.b.m and 
>>in alt.lang.basic and it has been pleasing to note that a consensus 
>>seems to have been reached.
[snip]
>>If I may be so bold as to summarise the conclusion here as I see it:
>>
>>   One should use GOTO when it is necessary and one should 
>>   avoid it when it is not needed.
[...]
>I use it because I know it is necessary in my work, and I use it
>because it is the best construction to use in the situations I use it.

Hah!  We agree.

[snip]
>I stopped arguing this point because I just don't give a ****
>anymore - not because a consensus has been reached.
>You are terribly wrong to assume that has happened.

I assume you're not a Pom?  ;-)

Cheers, Phred.

-- 
ppnerkDELETE@[EMAIL PROTECTED]