Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Basic General > Re: Why use Bas...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 39 of 99 Topic 595 of 684
Post > Topic >>

Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?)

by ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Aug 26, 2007 at 04:36 PM

On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 02:57:54 -0700, "news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
<news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>On Aug 26, 12:35 am, "Tom Lake" <tl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> It's in the de jure (ANSI/ISO) standard for BASIC, not the de facto
>> standard.
>
>I know you would wish it to be otherwise, but the ANSI/ISO BASIC
>standards are as irrelevant to this discussion as they are to any
>other.  In any case I doubt that the 1978 standard, which is the only
>one which might apply to a discussion of BASIC's 'fundamentals',
>included any looping constructs other than FOR...NEXT, did it?
I don't know, lets see:
AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD X3.113-1987

                 Table 1.  BASIC Keywords
                 ========================
        --------------------------------------------
        c = core                   r = real-time
        f = enhanced files         d = fixed decimal
        g = graphics               e = editing
 ----------------------------------------------------------
<snip>
 DISPLAY     c        DO          c        DRAW         g
<snip>
 FIRST       e        FIXED       d        FOR          c
<snip>
 GO          c        GOSUB       c        GOTO         c
<snip>
 RETRY       c        RETURN      c        REWRITE      f
 SAME        c        SEIZE       r        SELECT       cr
<snip>

Seems to include DO, also.

>The BASIC I am most involved with and know most about was originally
>developed in 1981.  At that time FOR...NEXT was the only looping
>structure in most BASICs; BBC BASIC was one of the first to add
>anything else (REPEAT...UNTIL, and later WHILE...ENDWHILE).
>
>When did any other kind of loop first appear in a Microsoft BASIC?
The earliest MS Basic that I have is GWBasic.  "DO" seems to have
appeared in QuickBasic 3.  "FOR" & "WHILE" appear to exist in all the
MS Basics that I have.
-- 
ArarghMail708 at [drop the 'http://www.'
from ->] http://www.arargh.com
BCET Basic Compiler Page: http://www.arargh.com/basic/index.html

To reply by email, remove the extra stuff from the reply address.
 




 99 Posts in Topic:
BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-06-12 11:24:07 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-20 10:49:06 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-20 14:30:40 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-20 19:45:32 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-08-21 09:50:27 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix
"Stephen J. Rush&quo  2007-08-23 13:25:42 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-23 17:29:28 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-23 22:51:49 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-24 00:07:22 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-24 09:16:50 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-24 11:43:29 
BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-08-24 13:06:53 
Re: BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC w
"Auric__" <n  2007-08-24 13:55:55 
Re: BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC w
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-08-25 09:37:36 
Re: BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC w
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-08-25 15:16:10 
Re: BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC w
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-08-26 17:12:29 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix
Paul Bartlett <bartlet  2007-08-23 19:23:13 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-23 20:23:38 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-25 02:20:42 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-08-25 10:29:12 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-25 11:10:05 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-25 14:32:05 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-25 20:49:13 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 03:27:43 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-25 14:34:26 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-25 19:18:05 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-25 20:38:48 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-25 19:35:57 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-25 20:43:14 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 03:26:03 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-26 04:08:50 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-25 20:32:35 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-08-26 16:31:30 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-25 14:42:56 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"winston19842005@[EM  2007-08-25 20:45:47 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-26 02:53:46 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-26 02:57:54 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 06:06:19 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-26 16:36:41 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-26 03:12:40 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 15:45:45 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"JJ" <stacko  2007-08-26 20:50:16 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 19:06:14 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-26 15:38:50 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-08-27 07:12:03 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-27 09:32:27 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-27 10:21:50 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
Gary <LanceGary@[EMAIL  2007-08-20 20:58:14 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix
"Stephen J. Rush&quo  2007-08-23 13:13:03 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-23 22:34:26 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-20 17:02:50 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-20 21:57:57 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-20 20:50:28 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-21 01:55:52 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-22 10:00:59 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-08-23 14:18:31 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-22 10:02:29 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-22 13:05:57 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-22 14:34:33 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-22 14:40:18 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-22 18:22:06 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix
"Stephen J. Rush&quo  2007-08-24 01:48:18 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-24 12:16:08 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Derek <derekrss@[EMAIL  2007-08-28 23:19:19 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-26 13:10:15 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-26 16:47:37 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-08-26 16:53:24 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 18:58:21 
Re: BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC w
"Stephen J. Rush&quo  2007-08-27 00:27:29 
Re: BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC w
"winston19842005@[EM  2007-08-26 23:28:26 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Derek <derekrss@[EMAIL  2007-08-28 22:58:17 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-22 10:10:55 
Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functi
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-22 12:22:52 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-22 15:36:50 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-26 02:38:12 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 06:01:33 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-26 03:05:17 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-26 16:19:29 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix
"Stephen J. Rush&quo  2007-08-26 14:12:07 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 15:47:53 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Vic Drastik <user@[EMA  2007-08-27 16:05:34 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-22 13:32:52 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
budgie <me@[EMAIL PROT  2007-08-23 08:58:20 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-08-23 14:07:19 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-22 13:41:16 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-22 17:31:07 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Derek <derekrss@[EMAIL  2007-08-28 22:41:08 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-29 01:58:42 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-26 15:23:01 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-26 17:59:18 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
Gary <LanceGary@[EMAIL  2007-08-22 22:23:57 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-23 08:10:09 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-22 19:09:11 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-23 01:55:41 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-23 09:57:01 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-23 11:47:12 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
RickE <eng@[EMAIL PROT  2007-08-23 06:42:48 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
Gary <LanceGary@[EMAIL  2007-08-23 06:52:07 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-23 10:39:30 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Oct 13 4:25:59 CDT 2008.