Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Basic General > Re: Why use Bas...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 33 of 99 Topic 595 of 702
Post > Topic >>

Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?)

by "Judson McClendon" <judmc@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aug 26, 2007 at 04:31 PM

<news@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Judson McClendon" <ju...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> I believe the fundamental BASIC syntax is
>> superior to either of these other languages. For example, VB still has
a
>> complete do/loop structure, where the 'while' or 'until' phrase may be
>> placed after the 'do' or after the 'loop', but none of the other
>> languages provide this full gamut.
>
> But that's *not* a "fundamental BASIC syntax" at all!  Several early
> BASICs had no DO or WHILE loop equivalent - all they had was
> FOR...NEXT.

Technically, you are correct. But I'm not interested in BASIC dialects
that are more than 20 years old, for the same reason I'm not 
interested in boiling my clothes or blacksmithy. They are of historical
interest only. :-)

> Incidentally 'C' also allows you to put the condition at the beginning
> or the end of a WHILE/DO loop, so VB isn't unique in that.

Yes, C sup****ts 'do while' pre and post, but not 'do until'. Some
conditions are more clearly or succinctly expressed as until than 
while. All modern BASICs I know of sup****t both, which was my point.

>  And 'C'
> has both 'break' and 'continue', which no BASIC dialect has as far as
> I know.

PowerBASIC has 'exit' and 'iterate' statements that do the same thing. C's
'for' is more powerful than BASIC's, but I consider it a 
bit more cryptic, as most things in C.
-- 
Judson McClendon      judmc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (remove zero)
Sun Valley Systems     http://sunvaley.com
"For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that
whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life."
 




 99 Posts in Topic:
BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-06-12 11:24:07 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-20 10:49:06 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-20 14:30:40 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-20 19:45:32 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-08-21 09:50:27 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix
"Stephen J. Rush&quo  2007-08-23 13:25:42 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-23 17:29:28 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-23 22:51:49 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-24 00:07:22 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-24 09:16:50 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-24 11:43:29 
BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-08-24 13:06:53 
Re: BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC w
"Auric__" <n  2007-08-24 13:55:55 
Re: BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC w
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-08-25 09:37:36 
Re: BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC w
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-08-25 15:16:10 
Re: BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC w
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-08-26 17:12:29 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix
Paul Bartlett <bartlet  2007-08-23 19:23:13 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-23 20:23:38 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-25 02:20:42 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-08-25 10:29:12 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-25 11:10:05 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-25 14:32:05 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-25 20:49:13 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 03:27:43 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-25 14:34:26 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-25 19:18:05 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-25 20:38:48 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-25 19:35:57 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-25 20:43:14 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 03:26:03 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-26 04:08:50 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-25 20:32:35 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-08-26 16:31:30 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-25 14:42:56 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"winston19842005@[EM  2007-08-25 20:45:47 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-26 02:53:46 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-26 02:57:54 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 06:06:19 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-26 16:36:41 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-26 03:12:40 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 15:45:45 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"JJ" <stacko  2007-08-26 20:50:16 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 19:06:14 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-26 15:38:50 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-08-27 07:12:03 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-27 09:32:27 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-27 10:21:50 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
Gary <LanceGary@[EMAIL  2007-08-20 20:58:14 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix
"Stephen J. Rush&quo  2007-08-23 13:13:03 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-23 22:34:26 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-20 17:02:50 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-20 21:57:57 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-20 20:50:28 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-21 01:55:52 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-22 10:00:59 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-08-23 14:18:31 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-22 10:02:29 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-22 13:05:57 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-22 14:34:33 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-22 14:40:18 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-22 18:22:06 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix
"Stephen J. Rush&quo  2007-08-24 01:48:18 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-24 12:16:08 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Derek <derekrss@[EMAIL  2007-08-28 23:19:19 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-26 13:10:15 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-26 16:47:37 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-08-26 16:53:24 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 18:58:21 
Re: BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC w
"Stephen J. Rush&quo  2007-08-27 00:27:29 
Re: BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC w
"winston19842005@[EM  2007-08-26 23:28:26 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Derek <derekrss@[EMAIL  2007-08-28 22:58:17 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-22 10:10:55 
Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functi
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-22 12:22:52 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-22 15:36:50 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-26 02:38:12 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 06:01:33 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-26 03:05:17 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-26 16:19:29 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix
"Stephen J. Rush&quo  2007-08-26 14:12:07 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 15:47:53 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Vic Drastik <user@[EMA  2007-08-27 16:05:34 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-22 13:32:52 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
budgie <me@[EMAIL PROT  2007-08-23 08:58:20 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-08-23 14:07:19 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-22 13:41:16 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-22 17:31:07 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Derek <derekrss@[EMAIL  2007-08-28 22:41:08 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-29 01:58:42 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-26 15:23:01 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-26 17:59:18 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
Gary <LanceGary@[EMAIL  2007-08-22 22:23:57 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-23 08:10:09 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-22 19:09:11 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-23 01:55:41 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-23 09:57:01 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-23 11:47:12 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
RickE <eng@[EMAIL PROT  2007-08-23 06:42:48 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
Gary <LanceGary@[EMAIL  2007-08-23 06:52:07 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-23 10:39:30 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Nov 20 18:36:13 CST 2008.