Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Basic General > Re: Why use Bas...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 5 Topic 616 of 685
Post > Topic >>

Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?)

by Troppo <troppo19@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aug 25, 2007 at 02:18 PM

Happy Trails <nomail@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
news:v49vc3p9si3rqnlolp0h7eh0am93vmbdq5@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 17:25:18 -0700, "R.Nicholson" <rhnlogic@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>>
>> [ snip ]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I guess I just care more than some people what I can accomplish with a
> PC.
> 
> I also don't think you can separate the two.  Every implementation of
> Basic, like other languages, had its own additional items that made it
> different from other implementations.  I do like the core language
> itself because it seems to be more logical to anybody whose mother
> tongue is english or anything with a similar sentence structure.
> 
> But you can't even talk about the simplicity of the language, through
> lack of what seems to me to be totally unnecessary bull****
> punctuation like C and java have, without talking about particular
> implementations.  Because some implementations allowed stuff that
> other didn't.
> 
> PDS, whether you used it's IDE or not, let you write code in the
> simplest, fastest way possible, that resulted in code that was still
> maintainable, and didn't force you into really stupid constructions
> because some egghead thought that's the way you should think.  By this
> I mean leaving out the GOTO's, or stupid bull**** like that.
> 
> You could write a Basic program the same way you could write a set of
> instructions for any simple manual procedure, complete with
> "go-back-and repeat-step-8-and-carry-on-from-there".  Why should
> software be any different?
> 
> The reason we have so many bits of software in a windows environment
> today that will not let you back out of a procedure step-by-step the
> same way you got into it, is because the only way you can do in an
> easy to program way is using something that works like a GOTO
> statement.
> 
> Basic has this; I like it.  It's a language feature, not an IDE
> feature.

Good points. Picking up earlier comments here - I run VBDOS on WinXP SP2, 
These days I'll do a lot of stuff in Excel that I used to do in Basic, 
but some things can't be done on a spreadsheet - or at least - I can't:-)
I stick with VBDOS for these because it seemed to be the last version 
that used 'Read' 'Data' functions rather than pulling stuff from a file.  
I keep things reasonably oranised in subroutines, but refuse to give up 
GOTO. VBDOS also has some nice date functions. I point anyone who can't 
run the compiled program to Dosbox or similar.
 




 5 Posts in Topic:
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-24 17:25:18 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-25 00:25:50 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Troppo <troppo19@[EMAI  2007-08-25 14:18:43 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-29 11:06:36 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-29 14:38:01 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Wed Oct 15 19:29:10 CDT 2008.