Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Basic General > BASIC with buil...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 99 Topic 595 of 675
Post > Topic >>

BASIC with built-in matrix functions?

by ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phred) Jun 12, 2007 at 11:24 AM

G'day mates,

Just wondering if anyone knows of a free (or reasonably priced) BASIC 
version which has built-in matrix functions.  The old Rocky Mountain 
BASIC [from Hewlett-Packard] had this ability, and the modern 
compatible BASIC from TransEra (HTBasic) also seems to:

<http://htbasic.com/htbwindows.html#Description>

<quoting marketing blurb from above link>
TransEra HTBasic, compatible with Hewlett-Packard's 9000 Series 
200/300 Rocky Mountain BASIC, runs on PCs in DOS or Windows. 
HTBasic is a powerful scientific /engineering language that 
combines the ease-of-use of BASIC, the math capabilities of 
FORTRAN and the structured-programming of Pascal and C. When 
combined with IEEE-488 or data acquisition plug-in cards, HTBasic 
turns your PC into a full-featured instrument controller.
</quoting>

Unfortunately, TransEra's pricing is somewhat, umm... commercial:

<http://htbasic.com/prices.html>

So I'm just wondering if anyone here knows of something similar at a 
more acceptable price for those of us motivated more by curiosity 
than livelihood in this case?  [I'm not really interested in the 
instrument control features of HTBasic, just the math.]

TIA and please note Followups are set to c.l.b.m

Cheers, Phred.

-- 
ppnerkDELETE@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 




 99 Posts in Topic:
BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-06-12 11:24:07 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-20 10:49:06 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-20 14:30:40 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-20 19:45:32 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-08-21 09:50:27 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix
"Stephen J. Rush&quo  2007-08-23 13:25:42 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-23 17:29:28 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-23 22:51:49 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-24 00:07:22 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-24 09:16:50 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-24 11:43:29 
BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-08-24 13:06:53 
Re: BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC w
"Auric__" <n  2007-08-24 13:55:55 
Re: BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC w
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-08-25 09:37:36 
Re: BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC w
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-08-25 15:16:10 
Re: BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC w
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-08-26 17:12:29 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix
Paul Bartlett <bartlet  2007-08-23 19:23:13 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-23 20:23:38 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-25 02:20:42 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-08-25 10:29:12 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-25 11:10:05 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-25 14:32:05 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-25 20:49:13 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 03:27:43 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-25 14:34:26 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-25 19:18:05 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-25 20:38:48 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-25 19:35:57 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-25 20:43:14 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 03:26:03 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-26 04:08:50 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-25 20:32:35 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-08-26 16:31:30 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-25 14:42:56 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"winston19842005@[EM  2007-08-25 20:45:47 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-26 02:53:46 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-26 02:57:54 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 06:06:19 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-26 16:36:41 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-26 03:12:40 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 15:45:45 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"JJ" <stacko  2007-08-26 20:50:16 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 19:06:14 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-26 15:38:50 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-08-27 07:12:03 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-27 09:32:27 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-27 10:21:50 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
Gary <LanceGary@[EMAIL  2007-08-20 20:58:14 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix
"Stephen J. Rush&quo  2007-08-23 13:13:03 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-23 22:34:26 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-20 17:02:50 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-20 21:57:57 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-20 20:50:28 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-21 01:55:52 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-22 10:00:59 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-08-23 14:18:31 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-22 10:02:29 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-22 13:05:57 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-22 14:34:33 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-22 14:40:18 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-22 18:22:06 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix
"Stephen J. Rush&quo  2007-08-24 01:48:18 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-24 12:16:08 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Derek <derekrss@[EMAIL  2007-08-28 23:19:19 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-26 13:10:15 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-26 16:47:37 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Judson McClendon&qu  2007-08-26 16:53:24 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 18:58:21 
Re: BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC w
"Stephen J. Rush&quo  2007-08-27 00:27:29 
Re: BASIC & strings [Was: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC w
"winston19842005@[EM  2007-08-26 23:28:26 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Derek <derekrss@[EMAIL  2007-08-28 22:58:17 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-22 10:10:55 
Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functi
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-22 12:22:52 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-22 15:36:50 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-26 02:38:12 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 06:01:33 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-26 03:05:17 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-26 16:19:29 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix
"Stephen J. Rush&quo  2007-08-26 14:12:07 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"Tom Lake" <  2007-08-26 15:47:53 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Vic Drastik <user@[EMA  2007-08-27 16:05:34 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-22 13:32:52 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
budgie <me@[EMAIL PROT  2007-08-23 08:58:20 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ppnerkDELETETHIS@[EMAIL P  2007-08-23 14:07:19 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-22 13:41:16 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-22 17:31:07 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Derek <derekrss@[EMAIL  2007-08-28 22:41:08 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-29 01:58:42 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-26 15:23:01 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ArarghMail708NOSPAM@[EMAI  2007-08-26 17:59:18 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
Gary <LanceGary@[EMAIL  2007-08-22 22:23:57 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-23 08:10:09 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"R.Nicholson" &  2007-08-22 19:09:11 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
"news@[EMAIL PROTECT  2007-08-23 01:55:41 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-23 09:57:01 
Re: Why use Basic at all? (was Re: BASIC with built-in matrix fu
Happy Trails <nomail@[  2007-08-23 11:47:12 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
RickE <eng@[EMAIL PROT  2007-08-23 06:42:48 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
Gary <LanceGary@[EMAIL  2007-08-23 06:52:07 
Re: BASIC with built-in matrix functions?
ted rosenberg <tedrose  2007-08-23 10:39:30 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Jul 24 14:03:16 CDT 2008.