Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Assembly Language > Re: Re: Crypto+...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 13 of 22 Topic 4946 of 5163
Post > Topic >>

Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too long.

by "Skybuck Flying" <spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 19, 2008 at 02:48 AM

earlier called General
*   Gutierrez "a guy of absolute unquestioned integrity."


And what if some terrorists wanted to sneak in an atom bomb?

Put a NAFTA sticker on it and drive right on in, y'all. Welcome to the
USA.

If you want to really be certain, hide the A-bomb in a truck full of
cocaine.

If a terrorist nuclear bomb ever goes off in this country,
it drove in from Mexico.

Meanwhile, Los Alamos National Laboratories developed technology that
allows an officer walking or driving down the street, as shown on MSNBC TV
6/9/97 www.TheSite.com, to determine whether anyone on the sidewalk is
carrying a gun.

The priorities are all out of whack.

Apply Military technology towards securing the border, not by spending
billions and billions and billions each year to secure each and every
one of us.

We don't put governing-monitors on all car engines to control speeding.
Get an Operations Research clue.


Is our government perpetuating the availability of drugs?

The 60 Minutes re****t sure makes it look like it is.

How could letting unchecked Mexican truck after unchecked Mexican truck
through not be?

!   FBI Director Louis J. Freeh, Senate Judiciary Committee, June 4, 1997
!
!   NEW CORRIDORS HAVE OPENED TO CONTINUE THE FLOOD OF DRUGS INTO AMERICA.

No ****, Sherlock!   Ya don't nafta say another word.

Every single truck can be checked using Military technology.

Robots build our American cars: make a wide range of standardized "Nafta"
containers and have robots empty the trucks (obviously not tanker trucks,
that's a different robot-checking line), have the robots inspect the
containers under the scrutiny of customs agents, then reload the truck.

Here's some border securing technology:

*
 




 22 Posts in Topic:
Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too lon
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-10 15:29:30 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-18 23:32:59 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-18 22:19:18 
Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too lon
Frank Kotler <fbkotler  2008-04-19 09:16:12 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-18 22:34:35 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 01:40:04 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 01:24:30 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 00:19:55 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-18 23:15:24 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 01:49:56 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 01:24:30 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 01:51:08 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 02:48:56 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 02:50:17 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 01:24:51 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 03:35:11 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 00:36:22 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 00:22:24 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 00:38:46 
OT: Has anyone seen Miss Liberty?
Evenbit <nbaker2328@[E  2008-04-20 10:31:58 
OT: Has anyone seen Miss Liberty?
Evenbit <nbaker2328@[E  2008-04-21 23:55:02 
OT: Has anyone seen Miss Liberty?
Evenbit <nbaker2328@[E  2008-04-22 00:59:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Oct 11 18:06:38 CDT 2008.