Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Assembly Language > Re: Re: Crypto+...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 11 of 22 Topic 4946 of 5156
Post > Topic >>

Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too long.

by "Skybuck Flying" <spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 19, 2008 at 01:24 AM

access to your cryptographic key.

We know what Key Recovery means...

By the way, the Government is restricting *communications* products, which
use public key cryptography. BY DEFINITION the SENDER will NEVER expect to
decrypt the traffic once they've encrypted it; that's the basis for public
key cryptography. That's how it works mathematically. By design.

So this "spare key" argument makes no sense whatsoever.

I shudder to think that most Americans will not understand these
admittedly
technocratic basic details of computer systems and cryptography.

If they knew, they would be STUNNED that our leaders would lie so boldly
to
us, including Mr. Kantor, to protect ECHELON.

That the public would misunderstand Kantor and Clinton to think they are
offering a "reasonable compromise"...even though what is actually
happening
is our government demanding you lose all right to privacy, that we must
give
the government a copy of our personal security key.


******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************


             Part 6: Louis Freeh & The Creeping Police State
             ---- -  ----- -----   --- -------- ------ -----

                     o Louis Freeh
                     o National ID Card
                     o Worldwide Banking and Phone Monitoring
                     o Cybernetic Control of Society
                     o Conclusions


******************************************************************************

                            Louis Freeh
                            ----- -----


            Louis Freeh is accompli****ng something that real
            terrorists themselves could never have accomplished.
 




 22 Posts in Topic:
Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too lon
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-10 15:29:30 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-18 23:32:59 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-18 22:19:18 
Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too lon
Frank Kotler <fbkotler  2008-04-19 09:16:12 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-18 22:34:35 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 01:40:04 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 01:24:30 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 00:19:55 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-18 23:15:24 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 01:49:56 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 01:24:30 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 01:51:08 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 02:48:56 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 02:50:17 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 01:24:51 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 03:35:11 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 00:36:22 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 00:22:24 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 00:38:46 
OT: Has anyone seen Miss Liberty?
Evenbit <nbaker2328@[E  2008-04-20 10:31:58 
OT: Has anyone seen Miss Liberty?
Evenbit <nbaker2328@[E  2008-04-21 23:55:02 
OT: Has anyone seen Miss Liberty?
Evenbit <nbaker2328@[E  2008-04-22 00:59:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue Oct 7 16:01:27 CDT 2008.