Re: multiplication differences in HLA and gnu as

Betov wrote:
> Frank Kotler <fbkotler@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> écrivait news:1WHIj.3710$yd2.1182
> @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>>I may have mentioned that I think HLA syntax is a mistake from "begin" 
>>to "end"... inclusive. I find it "weird" that Randy was disappointed 
>>that Nasm wasn't "true Intel syntax" (which it isn't)... and then he 
>>writes *this* thing!
> 
> No problem: For an HLL, one is allowed to do what he wants
> with the syntax.

And for an Alien Level Language ("ALL" - sounds very "inclusive...) I 
suppose HLAlien syntax is expected...

Good to hear from you. You've been so quiet, I've been worried! I 
imagine you're laughing your ass of at Ivan's "suicidal" program(s). 
Well *usually* if it'll run on one Linux it'll run on any of the 
Linuxii. Honest! Or maybe I've just been lucky... How are you getting 
along with Ubuntu?

Best,
Frank