lisztnet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well not sue if you are spamming or asking for critique. I'll be kind
and assume the latter.
>
http://www.molinellidesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/carozza-bella.jpg
Well, not really. Depends on the application. For web use, not very good
at all. 164Kb just for a logo is not very good on bandwidth. A little
compression would help, but a feathery intricate graphic is hard to keep
clear with JPG. So reducing color depth, I used 32 colors and got a
decent looking PNG at 28Kb. But fine intricate graphic logos do not
scale well so I'd say it has very limited application. In high
resolution printing applications it might be okay.
>
>
> http://www.molinellidesign.com/
Okay you are spamming, right?
>
>
> http://www.molinellidesign.com/?paged=2
These are not very good examples of how to make a commercial website.
Firstly, microfont that is grey on white...
Secondly, the "Scroll-O-Death" layout that the 90s newbies of geocities
infamy.
Thirdly. Ugh! Do not scale images with HTML attributes! Resample to
size, resample, resample, resample, resample! 880kB for one image
alone!!! 1134x880 is not a suitable size for a webpage, and not
optimized at all! Just stripping out your Canon PowerShot S80 EXIF info
and a little compression reduce the file to 92Kb.
Fourthly, the site is impossibly slow for dialup.
Lastly, I am assaulted by some loud shuddering "music"!!!
>
> Need a gimp tutorial for all that; one need a real pen and paper for
> real design...? ;)
Not sure this translated well...
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
|
