Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Html > Re: <p> inside ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 29 of 50 Topic 9882 of 10664
Post > Topic >>

Re: <p> inside <div>

by Travis Newbury <TravisNewbury@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 7, 2008 at 03:39 AM

On May 7, 2:42 am, Butch61 <Contac...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Sorry Sir.  You don't get off that easily.
> When you call somebody's work "****" it's offensive no matter how you
> spin it.
> And yeah, I took offense.

If you took offense then then you either need a thicker skin, or you
should just leave now because Usenet is not known for it's politeness
and you are bound to be offended again.   Tell me, if you had a
boogger hanging on the side of your nose would you you rather me let
you walk around in public with the boogger on your nose, or would you
rather I tell you about the booger so you can fix it.   Well consider
this me telling you that your site has a booger on the side of its
nose.

In the time you took to reply you cold have looked at several sites
from the competition and gained some knowledge.

> > Why are these sites better than yours?
> Actually, I DID check out the competition!
> And my boss and I came up with this design.
> Sorry but I don't have a real creative visual eye for graphic design.

Why are you continually putting yourself down? "I'm not good at
this..", "I don't have a real creative eye.."  Listen, all I am doing
is giving you good advice.  And all your doing is making excuses.
Feel free to do with it what ever you want.

> And, frankly I kinda like some of the stuff we came up with.

If you like what you did, then by all means ignore everything I said
and continue on the track you are headed.  If you want to get better,
then follow my advice. It is pretty.

> The boss has been getting good response for 2 years from the site we
> originally designed which, in our opinion, isn't as good as this one.
> Suffice to say, you aren't a bride in need of a limo service for your
> wedding so you don't know what they want.

Not a bride, but I was in the need for a limo today.  It is my
daughter's 18 birthday and we are picking her and some of her friends
up in a limo and headed to Chateau Elan (http://
www.chateauelanatlanta.com/) for dinner.

> And you must have been doing this long enough that you've lost sight
> of how hard it really is.
> I know html and css relatively well, and it's a ***** trying to make
> it work in a variety of browsers.

Someone here (I think Neredbojias) had a very simple flexible width
multi column template that would meet your every need for this site.
You had a header section, a couble of columns and a footer.  You could
jump ahead a few steps in your quest if you got that (or google
"flexible width web templates free")


> > Barbs or honesty?  If there were malice and I called you a dumb ass,
> > then that would be throwing barbs.  I just told you the facts.

> No you didn't.  My website being "****" is NOT a fact.  It's your
> opinion.
> Again, you can't spin it any other way.

Nope, it looks like ****.

> You provided a solution in your original post and good advice it was.
> If you'd have offered that advice without the editorial comments we
> wouldn't be having this conversation.

I got your attention didn't I?  And now it is up to you to decide if
you are going fix your problem, or just complain about it for 3 or 4
more posts.... (I vote for fixing the problem)
>
> > I am expecting another URL in 2 weeks from you.
>
> A worthy challenge.
> Without a doubt I'm smart enough to know that if I can please harsh,
> in-the-know critics like you, my work will be far better.

I am not an in the know critic.  Jukka, Adrienne, Dorayme, and a few
of the others here are the "people in the know" I am here for comic
relief, promoting Flash, and telling people the truth about their
sites.  I don;'t have a clue how to fix the original problem you asked
about, but THAT is the least of your pages problems.

> But I also
> know that average people don't scrutinize these things as hard as you
> do and will be happy with much less.

Why yes, that is always a good plan. Go with the average opinion...

> Thanks for your advice, and, perhaps you should try to sugar-coat it
> in the future so as not to offend sensitive folks like me.

But then I wouldn't get your attention.
 




 50 Posts in Topic:

inside

Butch61 <ContactUs@[EM  2008-05-05 20:47:06 
Re:

inside

dorayme <doraymeRidThi  2008-05-06 14:58:12 
Re:

inside

Adrienne Boswell <arbp  2008-05-06 04:59:20 
Re:

inside

Butch61 <ContactUs@[EM  2008-05-05 22:31:24 
Re:

inside

Ed Jay <edMbj@[EMAIL P  2008-05-05 23:00:34 
Re:

inside

Jim Moe <jmm-list.AXSP  2008-05-05 23:09:02 
Re:

inside

Neredbojias <me@[EMAIL  2008-05-06 07:24:20 
Re:

inside

Ben C <spamspam@[EMAIL  2008-05-06 06:14:30 
Re:

inside

Travis Newbury <Travis  2008-05-08 03:01:34 
Re:

inside

Holger Suhr <holgerhol  2008-05-14 10:02:59 
Re:

inside

dorayme <doraymeRidThi  2008-05-14 18:19:09 
Re:

inside

"Jonathan N. Little&  2008-05-14 09:09:07 
Re:

inside

dorayme <doraymeRidThi  2008-05-15 08:22:09 
Re:

inside

"Jonathan N. Little&  2008-05-14 18:30:35 
Re:

inside

dorayme <doraymeRidThi  2008-05-15 12:54:48 
Re:

inside

Butch61 <ContactUs@[EM  2008-05-06 00:47:07 
Re:

inside

Gus Richter <gusrichte  2008-05-06 04:25:08 
Re:

inside

Travis Newbury <Travis  2008-05-06 02:20:50 
Re:

inside

Travis Newbury <Travis  2008-05-06 02:34:23 
Re:

inside

dorayme <doraymeRidThi  2008-05-07 06:43:26 
Re:

inside

Butch61 <ContactUs@[EM  2008-05-06 08:08:09 
Re:

inside

"Beauregard T. Shagn  2008-05-06 18:04:31 
Re:

inside

Travis Newbury <Travis  2008-05-06 12:26:01 
Re:

inside

Travis Newbury <Travis  2008-05-06 15:52:40 
Re:

inside

dorayme <doraymeRidThi  2008-05-07 10:30:25 
Re:

inside

Neredbojias <me@[EMAIL  2008-05-07 02:56:19 
Re:

inside

Butch61 <ContactUs@[EM  2008-05-06 23:42:18 
Re:

inside

"Kabuki Armadillo&qu  2008-05-07 21:43:15 
Re:

inside

Travis Newbury <Travis  2008-05-07 03:39:30 
Re:

inside

Travis Newbury <Travis  2008-05-07 03:42:02 
Re:

inside

Travis Newbury <Travis  2008-05-07 03:47:29 
Re:

inside

Neredbojias <me@[EMAIL  2008-05-07 19:33:38 
Re:

inside

Blinky the Shark <no.s  2008-05-07 17:38:38 
Re:

inside

Neredbojias <me@[EMAIL  2008-05-08 08:01:14 
Re:

inside

Blinky the Shark <no.s  2008-05-07 23:17:15 
Re:

inside

Neredbojias <me@[EMAIL  2008-05-08 10:10:53 
Re:

inside

Butch61 <ContactUs@[EM  2008-05-07 06:14:31 
Re:

inside

Ben C <spamspam@[EMAIL  2008-05-07 10:10:42 
Re:

inside

Jim Moe <jmm-list.AXSP  2008-05-07 12:39:48 
Re:

inside

Andy Dingley <dingbat@  2008-05-07 07:37:02 
Re:

inside

Travis Newbury <Travis  2008-05-07 12:24:49 
Re:

inside

Neredbojias <me@[EMAIL  2008-05-07 21:24:21 
Re:

inside

Travis Newbury <Travis  2008-05-07 12:25:42 
Re:

inside

Travis Newbury <Travis  2008-05-07 18:44:58 
Re:

inside

Ed Jay <edMbj@[EMAIL P  2008-05-07 19:06:41 
Re:

inside

Travis Newbury <Travis  2008-05-07 18:45:51 
Re:

inside

Travis Newbury <Travis  2008-05-08 03:03:39 
Re:

inside

Travis Newbury <Travis  2008-05-08 04:27:17 
Re:

inside

Adrienne Boswell <arbp  2008-05-08 14:29:45 
Re:

inside

Neredbojias <me@[EMAIL  2008-05-08 20:48:44 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Oct 11 15:27:53 CDT 2008.