Re: New Input type proposal

Alexander Mueller wrote:
> Harlan Messinger wrote:
>>
>> Right, that's what I already said (see below): both would be equally 
>> weak situations. It's for that reason that a truly secure application 
>> *stores* the *hash* but *expects* the *password*. Your proposal is 
>> compatible only with an application that has this other security hole.
> 
> Sorry, but what should be weak about this? You havent backed your 
> statement with nothing. Please state facts and not only rumors.

I explained it already. Sorry if it went by you.