This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------070003060508070209040308
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Simon wrote:
>Dear Roger,
>
>Yeah I had a look at the graph it looks like the oscillation of the
sunspots
>is on a climb, this could be because of several factorials, but
>fundamentally it means from my understanding that a layer in the reaction
>that is the sun is probably reaching a finality point that is increasing
the
>sunspots, also remember the data you have now is conclusive the database
of
>information back before our ability to properly measure this would leave
you
>with an inclusive result, but not a true spectrum.
>
>
>
>>Here is a picture of the two curves together:
>>http://profile.imeem.com/GUmj0c/photo/uHsjrgaAz1/
>>
>>In conclusion, this fractal approach to sunspot numbers
>>seems to have some virtues over a simple "beats" of cycles approach
>>or the Mathematica neural net approach.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
Here's where I got the data:
4. Group Sunspot Numbers (Doug Hoyt re-evaluation) 1610-1995
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/SOLAR/ftpsunspotnumber.html#hoyt
ftp://ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/STP/SOLAR_DATA/SUNSPOT_NUMBERS/GROUP_SUNSPOT_NUMBERS/yearrg.dat
Two other sources of the 10.9 to 11.03 main cycle have been suggested:
1) Jupiter tidal effect (orbital period of Jupiter
11.86 years)
2) Tritium -- Half-Life: 12.32 Years
Jupiter has about the same mass tidal effect as Venus with has a more
rapid orbital period of 0.815 years. No beat effect of the two seems to
fit the cycle.
Tritium cycles seem unlikely in the sun: carbon cycles
are more likely?
It appear that the weather hypothesis is the best as of now for the cause.
--------------070003060508070209040308
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Simon wrote:
<blockquote cite="midbJ95j.3556$nL3.900@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Dear Roger,
Yeah I had a look at the graph it looks like the oscillation of the
sunspots
is on a climb, this could be because of several factorials, but
fundamentally it means from my understanding that a layer in the reaction
that is the sun is probably reaching a finality point that is increasing
the
sunspots, also remember the data you have now is conclusive the database
of
information back before our ability to properly measure this would leave
you
with an inclusive result, but not a true spectrum.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Here is a picture of the two curves together:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://profile.imeem.com/GUmj0c/photo/uHsjrgaAz1/">http://profile.imeem.com/GUmj0c/photo/uHsjrgaAz1/</a>
In conclusion, this fractal approach to sunspot numbers
seems to have some virtues over a simple "beats" of cycles approach
or the Mathematica neural net approach.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
</pre>
</blockquote>
Here's where I got the data:<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72"> 4. Group Sunspot Numbers (Doug Hoyt
re-evaluation) 1610-1995
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/SOLAR/ftpsunspotnumber.html#hoyt">http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/SOLAR/ftpsunspotnumber.html#hoyt</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="ftp://ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/STP/SOLAR_DATA/SUNSPOT_NUMBERS/GROUP_SUNSPOT_NUMBERS/yearrg.dat">ftp://ftp.ngdc.noaa.gov/STP/SOLAR_DATA/SUNSPOT_NUMBERS/GROUP_SUNSPOT_NUMBERS/yearrg.dat</a>
Two other sources of the 10.9 to 11.03 main cycle have been suggested:
1) Jupiter tidal effect (orbital period of Jupiter
11.86 years)
2) Tritium — Half-Life: 12.32 Years
Jupiter has about the same mass tidal effect as Venus with has a more
rapid orbital period of 0.815 years. No beat effect of the two seems to
fit the cycle.
Tritium cycles seem unlikely in the sun: carbon cycles
are more likely?
It appear that the weather hypothesis is the best as of now for the cause.
</pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------070003060508070209040308--
|
