On Mar 11, 1:13 pm, Roger Bagula <rlbag...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Let's give other readers 24 hours to think about these ideas, rather
than instantly "covering them up with a follow-up". Would that be
possible?
The large-scale distribution does look like a fractal distribution,
and also like a high-energy distribution of plasma particles.
But look at nature in a more direct, general way.
The universe is composed of galaxies. These galaxies are composed of
"point-like" stellar objects. These stellar objects are composed of
"point-like" atomic objects. It looks like nature is a *global*
discrete fractal hierarchy.
The Universe is fractal not only *within* one Scale, like the
Galactic
Scale; it is also fractal throughout the entire hierarchy of discrete
Scales ( ..., subquantum, atomic, stellar, galactic,
metagalactic, ... ).
Demonstration that the different Scales are highly self-similar and a
derivation of the scaling equations that allow one to compare all
lengths, times and m***** of analogues on different Scales, can be
found at www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw .
When I urge people to consider a new fractal paradigm, I am talking
about something far more radical than just within-Scale fractal
models. Nature is one single unified system with a discrete self-
similar structure. The same geometry and laws of physics should apply
on all fundamental Scales of nature's hierarchy. The incompatability
between QM and GR must be removed because nature tells us that nature
is unified and physics must eventually figure out how to handle that
unity, mathematically. The Self-Similar Cosmological Paradigm already
shows how to handle nature's unity conceptually and empirically.
Thanks for the chance to air my views,
Rob
www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw
|
