Talk About Network



Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Fractals > The debate over...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 2 Topic 129 of 206
Post > Topic >>

The debate over fractals is proving most fractious

by Roger Bagula <rlbagula@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 28, 2006 at 09:14 PM

http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/news/116695368129410.xml&coll=2
( first page of 7 pages: I've posted several, other articles on this at 
sci.fractals)
The debate over fractals is proving most fractious
Case physicists roil scientific, art worlds
Sunday, December 24, 2006
John Mangels
Plain Dealer Science Writer

Kate Jones-Smith is the first to admit she's no artist.

The Case Western Reserve University physics student's doodles would look 
at home in a kindergarten classroom. One of her drawings -- a 
constellation of crude circles that resembles a bad case of chickenpox 
-- was so ugly she titled it "Gross Pebbles."

Jones-Smith, in short, is no Jackson Pollock.

And yet, the 60-second scribbles she churned out on her computer one 
evening this year fit the criteria of genuine Pollocks. They contain the 
same distinctive geometric shapes that the famous abstract painter 
supposedly spent his career perfect- ing.

According to University of Oregon physicist Richard Taylor, who has 
spent years mathematically analyzing the expressionist's 
drip-and-splatter canvases, only Pollock was able to master the ability 
to consistent- ly create the complex pat- terns known as fractals in his 
artwork.

The layers upon layers of paint in Pollock works such as "Blue Poles: 
Number 11" and "Full Fathom Five" are "dense webs of fractals," Taylor 
has written.

The researcher has staked his professional reputation on -- and won a 
good deal of fame for -- his purported ability to judge real Pollocks 
from imitations, based on what he says is their unique fractal signature.

So how to explain Jones-Smith's childlike jottings, which she has shown 
can pass Taylor's Pollock tests?

"That's the whole thing - they're not very aesthetically appealing, yet 
they're fractal," Jones-Smith said. "It attacks pretty much every one of 
[Taylor's] claims. You can look at this and see either his criteria are 
wrong, or these drawings are genuine Pollocks."

Taylor strongly disputes the findings, calling them "fundamentally
flawed."

CONTINUED   1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7  Next




 2 Posts in Topic:
The debate over fractals is proving most fractious
Roger Bagula <rlbagula  2006-12-28 21:14:35 
so what is this all about : A painting by Jackson Pollock has so
Roger Bagula <rlbagula  2006-12-29 16:26:56 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Tue May 13 20:22:58 CDT 2008.