Re: cot, sec, csc?

"Richard Heathfield" wrote:

> Sleipnir said:
>
>> I think adding the famous "inline" front of each declaration could be
>> better ;)
>
> ...which is a great way to limit their usability - not all
implementations
> provide an inline keyword, and none (except the tiny handful of C99
> compilers) is obliged to mean the same by it as you (probably) do.

And what is your guess as to what he (probably) meant?

Does the smiley mean this is a really dumb idea?  Have a nice day?  I am a

nice guy?  What??