Philip Potter wrote:
> Ben Bacarisse wrote:
....
> Indeed. To the OP: how did you manage to state that parseargs() had two
> different declarations? You should *never* type code into a usenet
> message - copy-and-paste instead, so that the code you post is exactly
> the same as the code you're using.
You're right. I knew better, but was a bit fuzzy and probably should not
have been posting at 3:00 am, but it was a case of, "If I can get this one
thing done, I can go to bed knowing it's resolved." I'm still out of it
(from lack of sleep) now, so maybe I should just put this on the shelf for
a bit and take a break.
> From the other message you've posted, I conclude you don't realise that
> the [] in a parameter is significant. The following:
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv)
>
> is incorrect, while both of:
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
>
> are correct and completely equivalent..
So
char *argv[]
and
char **argv
are essentially the same?
Hal
|
