On Mar 13, 11:14=A0am, Richard Heathfield <r...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Hal Vaughan said:
> > Richard Heathfield wrote:
> >> Hal Vaughan said:
> >>> From what I see in the reference I
> >>> use at cplusplus.com,
>
> >> Uurgh.
>
> > It's giving me what I need with examples. =A0If you have a reference
sit=
e
> > that provides more, I'll be glad to check it out!
>
> Well, as you may have gathered, for C++ advice (including decent
reference=
> sites), you'd be better off asking the C++ fans amongst us. Although I
> like C++, I don't like it as much as I like C. My experience of
> cplusplus.com has been as a *C* reference site (for which purpose it is
> often recommended, although heaven knows why). Maybe it fares better as
a
> C++ site. I don't know.
>
> Perhaps one of the more C++y people will give you a better answer.
>
Not sure if I am "one of the more C++y people", but I would recommend
www.dinkumware.com as a definitive reference site for both C and C++.
Note that it covers only the libraries of the two languages, and is
not a tutorial.
- Anand
|
