Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Programming > Borland Delphi > Re: Crypto++ (C...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 22 Topic 3681 of 3830
Post > Topic >>

Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too long.

by "Skybuck Flying" <spam@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Apr 10, 2008 at 03:29 PM

Hello,

When I tested the SSE2 implementation in a larger application I did not 
notice any improvement.

One possibility could be because the SSE2 implementation uses more 
instructions than the Delphi/DCPCryptV2 library.

Thus the SSE2 implementation might take up too much L1 instruction cache
and 
slow down the program ?

Pure speculation, I don't know for sure ;)

Altering the SSE2 implementation to use routines instead might give more 
performance for larger applications (?!)

Bye,
  Skybuck.
 




 22 Posts in Topic:
Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too lon
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-10 15:29:30 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-18 23:32:59 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-18 22:19:18 
Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too lon
Frank Kotler <fbkotler  2008-04-19 09:16:12 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-18 22:34:35 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 01:40:04 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 01:24:30 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 00:19:55 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-18 23:15:24 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 01:49:56 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 01:24:30 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 01:51:08 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 02:48:56 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 02:50:17 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 01:24:51 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 03:35:11 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 00:36:22 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 00:22:24 
Re: Re: Crypto++ (Cryptopp) 5.5.2 Tiger implementation maybe too
"Skybuck Flying"  2008-04-19 00:38:46 
OT: Has anyone seen Miss Liberty?
Evenbit <nbaker2328@[E  2008-04-20 10:31:58 
OT: Has anyone seen Miss Liberty?
Evenbit <nbaker2328@[E  2008-04-21 23:55:02 
OT: Has anyone seen Miss Liberty?
Evenbit <nbaker2328@[E  2008-04-22 00:59:43 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sun Jul 6 10:33:59 CDT 2008.