Talk About Network

Google




Programming > Cobol Misc > Re: compiler di...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 8 of 10 Topic 177 of 183
Post > Topic >>

Re: compiler directive

by "William M. Klein" <wmklein@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 9, 2008 at 01:07 AM

Both Micro Focus and Fujitsu have compilers that are free (or virtually so)
for 
"personal" (not business) purposes.  Both of them sup****t free format
reference 
format.

  SOURCEFORMAT"FREE"
    is the style that Micro Focus uses

 @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 SRF(FREE, FREE)
   is the way the Fujitsu specifies it.

See the archives of comp.lang.cobol for how to get the "free" (ore
relatively 
so) versions of the Micro Focus and Fujitsu compilers.

   ***

To the best of my knowledge, RM does NOT supply a free/low-cost compiler
that 
sup****ts free format reference format - which I think might have been the 
original (misleading) question.

-- 
Bill Klein
 wmklein <at> ix.netcom.com
"happytoday" <ehabaziz2001@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:fc2f703a-5f8f-4554-a7e0-91d5d38d3888@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 May 5, 9:15 am, Robert <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sun, 4 May 2008 15:07:24 -0700 (PDT), Richard <rip...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> >On May 4, 12:29 pm, happytoday <ehabaziz2...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> What is the equalivent for the compiler directive SET
> >> SOURCEFORMT"FREE" in NetExpress to be compiled under Rmcobol 85 ?
>
> >There probably isn't one. RM Cobol 85 requires the source code to be
> >in Cobol 85 format.
>
> >"FREE" is a MF extension designed to inhibit the transfer of code to
> >other compilers and ensure that MF locks in its users.
>
> Fujitsu and Realia sup****ted free form. Only IBM insisted on punched
card 
> format.
>
> Free form is in the 2002 Cobol Standard.

I need it to try come cobol examples containing that statement :
SOURCEFORMAT"FREE"

SO I need a free compiler that sup****t that directive .

Thanks
 




 10 Posts in Topic:
compiler directive
happytoday <ehabaziz20  2008-05-03 17:29:30 
Re: compiler directive
Richard <riplin@[EMAIL  2008-05-04 15:07:24 
Re: compiler directive
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-05-05 02:59:28 
Re: compiler directive
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-05 01:15:55 
Re: compiler directive
happytoday <ehabaziz20  2008-05-08 12:03:51 
Re: compiler directive
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-08 18:11:03 
Re: compiler directive
Robert <no@[EMAIL PROT  2008-05-08 18:14:52 
Re: compiler directive
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-05-09 01:07:45 
Re: compiler directive
happytoday <ehabaziz20  2008-05-08 23:32:47 
Re: compiler directive
"William M. Klein&qu  2008-05-09 22:14:26 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Tue Jan 6 3:05:33 PST 2009.